Opinion

Millington v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.

  • 47 Ark. 301
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
May 15, 1886
Status
Published
Author
Cockrill
On the bench
Cockrill
Cited by
20 cases

The opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON ' MOTION FOR' 'REHEARING' BY ' APPELLANT.

Cockrill, C. J. - In ah application for a rehearing, our attention, is directed, -for the first time, notwithstanding the elaborate.^oral and printed, arguments, to the fact that the decree condemns the land to be sold-on a credit of twelve months, a period longer.than is.-.authorized, by statute. - The record.does not show that.the decree has been executed, .and if a sale .takes place after the mandate it may be apprehended that -the order of sale is approved as to the credit to be given. It is proper to notice this error to prevent misapprehension.

Also an allowance to B. F, Grace, as administrator of the estate of Seth W. Bolton, to pay expenses of administration, was improper and must be disallowed on the rendition of the new decree. ...........

The decree.of this-court-will Be modified in:accordance-with these directions. '- -. ■;

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.