Opinion

Snelson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

  • 93 Pa. Commw. 539
  • 502 A.2d 734
  • 1985 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1441
Court
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 18, 1985
Status
Published
Author
Craig
On the bench
Craig, Kalish, Palladino, Pallamno
Cited by
12 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.1%

particular circumstances of alleged crime sufficient to establish ineligibility

How later courts described this case

  • particular circumstances of alleged crime sufficient to establish ineligibility

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Craig :

The majority opinion acknowledges .that:

In the case at bar, no showing was made as to what the specifically assigned duties of claimant were in his capacity as a housekeeper.

Hence, this case lacks the necessary basis for the majority’s holding that the evidence established the claimant’s conduct to be “incompatible with his work responsibilities. ’ ’

The decision should be to remand the case for findings as to the nature of the claimant’s work responsibilities and the relationship, if any, of bis external conduct, to those work responsibilities. Clark v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 80 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 513 , 471 A.2d 1309 (1984).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.