Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knupp

  • 512 Pa. 614
  • 518 A.2d 252
  • 1986 Pa. LEXIS 917
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 24, 1986
Status
Published
Author
McDermott
On the bench
Flaherty, Hutchinson, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

McDERMOTT, Justice,

concurring and dissenting.

I join the majority opinion insofar as it holds that “an applicant for A.R.D. can waive the processing time of an A.R.D. application.” P. 623. However, on the record before us I see no need for a remand, and would find that Mr. Knupp waived his Rule 1100 complaint.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.