Opinion

Harrington v. Tate

  • 435 Pa. 176
  • 254 A.2d 622
  • 1969 Pa. LEXIS 707
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 27, 1969
Status
Published
Author
Chieebell
On the bench
Bebí, Bell, Bkien, Brien, Chiee, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Pomeroy, Roberts
Cited by
8 cases

holding that advisory board was advisory in nature and its decisions are merely recommendations

How later courts described this case

  • holding that advisory board was advisory in nature and its decisions are merely recommendations

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Chiee Justice Bell:

No provision in the Philadelphia Home Buie Charter permits the Mayor to appoint a police board having *183 not merely advisory powers but, in practical effect, Judicial review powers. The Home Rule Charter provides for only two review boards, namely, a Board of Licenses and Inspection Review and the Tax Review Board. Since the Police Board was illegally created, I dissent and would affirm the decision of the Chancellor below.

Mr. Justice O’Bkien joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.