Opinion

Pittsburgh Miracle Mile Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment

  • 417 Pa. 243
  • 209 A.2d 394
  • 1965 Pa. LEXIS 406
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Feb 25, 1965
Status
Published
Author
Bell
On the bench
Bbien, Bell, Cohen, Eagen, Jones, Musmanno, Roberts
Cited by
34 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

“The basic and controlling substantive issue in a real estate assessment appeal is the correctness of the total assessment of the proper ty as a unit.”

How later courts described this case

  • “The basic and controlling substantive issue in a real estate assessment appeal is the correctness of the total assessment of the proper ty as a unit.”
  • stipulation as to fair market value is merely evidentiary expedient on appeal and does not change court’s obligation to determine correctness of the assessment as a whole

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Bell:

I would affirm the Order of the Court below for the reasons set forth at length in my dissenting opin *249 ions in Morris v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 192 , 209 A. 2d 407 , and in Deitch Company v. Bd. of Property Assessment, 417 Pa. 213 , 209 A. 2d 397 .

Mr. Justice Musmanno joins in this Dissenting Opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.