Opinion

In re Manning

  • 24 N.Y.S. 1039
  • 71 Hun 236
  • 78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 236
  • 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 562
Court
New York Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 15, 1893
Status
Published
Author
Putnam
On the bench
Herrick, Putnam
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

PUTNAM, J.,

(dissenting.) After a careful consideration of this case, I have reached the conclusion that the order directing a peremptory mandamus to issue was properly granted by the court below, for the reasons stated by Justice FURSMAN in his opinion. His elaborate review of the questions involved renders it unnecessary to write any other opinion in the case. The order should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.