Opinion

Claim of Croce v. Ford Motor Co.

  • 307 N.Y. 125
  • 120 N.E.2d 527
  • 1954 N.Y. LEXIS 996
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
May 27, 1954
Status
Published
Author
Desmond
On the bench
Desmond, Lewis
Cited by
15 cases

The opinion

Desmond, J.

(dissenting). The measure of workmen’s compensation payments for temporary partial disability is “ two-thirds of the difference between the injured employee’s average weekly wages before the accident and his wage earning capacity after the accident ” (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 5). Subdivision 5-a of section 15 says that “ wage earning capacity ” of such temporarily and partially disabled employees shall be determined by “ actual earnings ”, if any. *132 These two subdivisions, read together, mean, to my mind, that in measuring after-accident “ earning capacity ” the board must take the wage rate the worker actually earns, not some theoretical, potential, or suppositious higher or lower rate. Thus, if a worker made $90 per week before injury and $60 afterwards, he is to be awarded two thirds of the difference, or $20 per week. But if that same man, shown by actual figures to have an after-accident earning capacity of $60 per week, is idle for a period, because of a strike of someone supplying materials to his employer, the latter fact does not change the physical, undisputed fact of his actual earning capacity of $60 per week. If that were not so, his “ earning capacity ”, which in fact remained at $60 per week, would have to be determined, for that period, at zero, just because the plant had to close temporarily for reasons not connected with his ‘ ‘ earning capacity ’ ’. If general economic conditions, or fluctuation in demand, or change of market, reduces, permanently or semipermanently, days of employment, a worker’s “ earning capacity ” is in fact reduced. But if his plant’s shutdown is because of some mechanical failure therein or because of some strike in a supplier’s plant, the worker’s “ actual earning capacity ” remains unchanged by such temporary stoppages. I do not think any of the cited cases contradict that.

I favor affirmance.

Conway, Dye and Froessel, JJ., concur with Lewis, Ch. J.; Desmond, J., dissents in an opinion in which Fuld and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.