Opinion

Pacific Bank v. Stone

  • 121 Cal. 202
  • 53 P. 634
  • 1898 Cal. LEXIS 875
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 14, 1898
Status
Published
Author
McFarland
On the bench
Chipman, McFarland
Cited by
20 cases

The opinion

McFARLAND, J., concurring.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance. The judgment of the court below on the facts of this case is right. There are, however, some general expressions in the opinion of the commissioner about the employment of an attorney by the president of a bank which are, in my opinion, too broad to be correctly applied to the case of a solvent bank continuously engaged in the regular prosecution of its' usual business.

Hearing in Bank denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.