The opinion
Temple, J., concurring.
I concur, on the ground that the statute did not authorize the formation of the new district.
Opinion
People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Parvin
- 74 Cal. 549
- 16 P. 490
- 1888 Cal. LEXIS 791
- Court
- California Supreme Court
- Filed
- Jan 25, 1888
- Status
- Published
- Author
- Temple
- On the bench
- McFarland, McKinstry, Temple
- Cited by
- 14 cases
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.