Opinion

Omnibus Railroad v. Baldwin

  • 57 Cal. 160
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1881
Status
Published
Author
Thornton
On the bench
McKinstry, Myrick, Ross, Sharpstein, Thornton
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.9%

The opinion

Thornton, J., dissenting:

I dissent. Conceding that the seventeenth section of the Act of 1872 is void, I am nevertheless of opinion that the track of the plaintiff corporation as laid down was lawfully in place, and that it could not be removed by defendants without its consent, and another put in its place, which it would be allowed by defendants to use. (See Railway Co. v. Alling, 99 U. S. 463, 475 .) The injunction was improperly dissolved. The order of the Court below should be reversed, and the injunction restored.

Mobbison, C. J., dissented.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.