Opinion

Hemme v. Hays

  • 55 Cal. 337
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 1, 1880
Status
Published
Author
Thornton
On the bench
Sharpstein, Thornton
Cited by
12 cases

The opinion

Thornton, J., concurring in the judgment:

I concur in the judgment, for the reason that the. appeal is taken from the judgment, and there is no bill of exceptions bringing before us the ruling of the'Court below on the motion for judgment on the pleadings. This motion and the ruling there *340 on is not made a part of the judgment roll by a bill of exceptions. Without such a bill it constitutes no part of the judgment roll, and, in my opinion, the ruling on the motion cannot be considered on this appeal, which is stated in the notice of appeal to be taken from the judgment roll.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.