Opinion

Scott v. Brown

  • 29 Misc. 320
  • 60 N.Y.S. 511
Court
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Filed
Oct 15, 1899
Status
Published
Author
Maolean
On the bench
Freedman, Maolean
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

MaoLean, J.

(dissenting). It does not seem to me that the plaintiffs have cured, upon the second trial, the defect in their case when it was brought before this tribunal upon the former *322 appeal, whereupon it was pointed out that to recover the.plaintiffs must prove “ such a uniform, continuous and general usage that the defendant must be presumed to have contracted with reference to it”

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.