Opinion

Collier v. Postum Cereal Co.

  • 149 A.D. 143
  • 133 N.Y.S. 852
  • 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6362
Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Filed
Feb 16, 1912
Status
Published
Author
Ingraham
On the bench
Ingraham, Laughlin, Miller
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

Ingraham, P. J. (concurring):

The discussion of this case by Mr. Justice Laughlin points out various rulings upon questions of evidence, exceptions taken to the charge as made, and refusals to charge, which I think are erroneous, and an examination of the record discloses that in consequence of the rulings of the learned trial judge both in regard to evidence and passing upon the defendant’s requests to charge, the case was not presented to the jury in such a way as to preserve the rights of the defendant.

I also concur with Mr. Justice Miller and, therefore, vote for a new trial.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.