Opinion

Le Flore County v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

185 Okla. 440

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Sep 12, 1939
Status: Published
Author: Gibsonhurst
On the bench: Batless, Corn, Danner, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Osborn, Riley, Welch
Cited by: 2 cases

The opinion

GIBSON and HURST, JJ.,

concur in the rules of law announced in paragraphs 1, 2. and 4 of the syllabus, and in the opinion in so far as denying the protest to the levy made pursuant to chapter 27, S. L. 1933, and in so far as sustaining the protest to the levy to pay the telephone company judgment, but dissent to the rule of law announced in paragraph 3 of the syllabus, and to that part of the opinion denying protest to the levies to pay those parts of the judgment for sheriff’s fees and expenses.

RILEY, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.