Opinion

Austin v. State

  • 796 S.W.2d 449
  • 1990 Tenn. LEXIS 299
Court
Tennessee Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 30, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Brien, Cooper, Drowota, Harbison
Cited by
5 cases

“The ultimate responsibility for the inspection and maintenance of [a bridge] was upon the Tennessee Department of Transportation under both federal and state law.”

How later courts described this case

  • “The ultimate responsibility for the inspection and maintenance of [a bridge] was upon the Tennessee Department of Transportation under both federal and state law.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The State of Tennessee has filed a petition to rehear. The petition disagrees with our interpretation of federal and state law with respect to the State’s duties and responsibilities in the area of inspection and maintenance of bridges that are on one of the Federal Aid Highway Systems.

We fully considered the same arguments presented in the petition to rehear in preparing the opinion heretofore released, have considered them again, and continue to adhere to the challenged holdings.

The petition to rehear is respectfully denied at the cost of the State of Tennessee.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.