Opinion

Hines Nurseries, Inc. v. Plumstead Township Board of Supervisors

  • 580 Pa. 357
  • 861 A.2d 260
  • 2004 Pa. LEXIS 2469
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Oct 20, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Files, Saylor
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.6%

when Board fails to cite to statute or ordinance to explain why application was denied, the application is deemed approved as filed

How later courts described this case

  • when Board fails to cite to statute or ordinance to explain why application was denied, the application is deemed approved as filed

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of October 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue: whether 53 P.S. § 10508(2) can be satisfied where the Board denies an application as filed and cites to a prior stipulation as the reason. The order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED. See Coretsky v. Board of Commissioners of Butler Township, 520 Pa. 513 , 555 A.2d 72, 74 (1989) (when Board fails to cite to statute or ordinance to explain why application was denied, the application is deemed approved as filed), and 53 P.S. § 10508(3) (same). Petitioner’s remaining issue is DENIED.

Justice SAYLOR files a Concurring Statement.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.