Opinion

Myerowitz v. Pathology Laboratory Diagnostics, Inc.

  • 451 Pa. Super. 72
  • 678 A.2d 404
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1950
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 10, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Tamilia
On the bench
Brosky, Elliott, Tamilia
Cited by
2 cases

order compelling arbitration is considered an unappealable, interlocutory order, because the parties are forced into, rather than put out of, court

How later courts described this case

  • order compelling arbitration is considered an unappealable, interlocutory order, because the parties are forced into, rather than put out of, court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TAMILIA Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. The majority misconstrues the effect of the claim for injunc-tive relief as to prevent irreparable harm. This is not the ease as the arbitrators can make the appellant whole financially or in damages if his colleagues have not acted properly. Because of the arbitration clause, the trial court lacks jurisdiction and cannot usurp the function of the arbitration board to grant the relief requested to render the function of arbitration in this case meaningless.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.