Opinion

Poteat v. King

  • 487 A.2d 215
  • 1984 D.C. App. LEXIS 585
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Oct 30, 1984
Status
Published
Author
Belson
On the bench
Beker, Belson, Ferren, MacK, Nebeker, Newman, Pryor, Rogers, Terry
Cited by
2 cases

“We refrain from issuing the writ of mandamus because we are confident that respondent, after reading this opinion, will afford petitioner the relief he requests.”

How later courts described this case

  • “We refrain from issuing the writ of mandamus because we are confident that respondent, after reading this opinion, will afford petitioner the relief he requests.”
  • mandamus appropriate to correct deficiencies in preliminary hearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Associate Judge BELSON

would grant rehearing en banc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.