Opinion

On Petition to Amend Rule 1 of the Rules Governing the Bar

  • 431 A.2d 521
  • 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 352
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
May 5, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Newman
On the bench
Ferren, Harris, Kelly, Kern, MacK, Nebeker, Newman, Pryor
Cited by
2 cases

denied amendment limiting use of compulsory dues

How later courts described this case

  • denied amendment limiting use of compulsory dues

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Separate Statement of

NEWMAN, Chief Judge,

dissenting:

I find it shameful that the District of Columbia Bar is to be permitted to shirk its responsibility to provide an institutional mechanism for the members of the legal profession in this jurisdiction to fulfill their ethical obligations mandated by the Code of Professional Responsibility merely because a majority of those voting in a referendum chose this path. We have the authority to prevent such a default. We should exercise it. *

Since there is not a majority of the court prepared to exercise this authority, I have voted to vacate the stay previously entered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.