Opinion

United States v. Pannell

  • 387 A.2d 736
  • 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 474
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 28, 1978
Status
Published
On the bench
Ferren, Gallagher, Harris, Kelly, Kern, MacK, Nebeker, Newman, Yeagley
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 61.0%

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc

Before * NEWMAN, Chief Judge and KELLY, KERN, GALLAGHER, NEBEKER, YEAGLEY, HARRIS, * MACK and * FERREN, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing or in the alternative for rehearing en banc, and it appearing that a majority of the judges of this Court have voted to deny the petition, it is

ORDERED that the en banc petition is denied; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied.

Associate Judges NEBEKER and HARRIS would grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.