Opinion

North River Insurance Co. v. Overton

59 So. 3d 1
2010 Ala. LEXIS 98
2010 WL 2342415

Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed: Jun 11, 2010
Status: Published
Author: Murdock
On the bench: Bolin, Cobb, Lyons, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Smith, Stuart, Woodall
Cited by: 6 cases

The opinion

MURDOCK, Justice

(concurring in the result).

I cannot agree with the statement in the main opinion that the record contained “no substantial evidence that Blythe was an agent of North River.” 59 So.3d at 12 (emphasis added). As to the issue of actual agency, it is enough to reach the conclusion that the summary judgment in favor of Overton and Waldrop was inappropriate that we are able to state that the record before the trial court did contain substantial evidence that Blythe was not an actual agent of North River.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.