Opinion

W.F. v. State

214 So. 3d 1153

Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed: Oct 30, 2015
Status: Published
Author: Murdock
On the bench: Bolin, Bryan, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
Cited by: 1 cases
Authority: More cited than 17.5%

The opinion

MURDOCK, Justice

(concurring in the result).

The elements of illegal hunting (or attempted illegal hunting) as described in Rogers v. State, 491 So.2d 987 (Ala.Crim.App.1985), do not equate to the elements of the offenses described in §§ 9-11-235 and 9-11-257, Ala.Code 1975, and Rule 220-2-11(1), Ala. Admin. Code (Department of Conservation and Natural Resources), specifically in relation to the elements of intent and an overt act. I agree that this Court should not follow Rogers . I concur in the result reached by the main opinion in this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.