Opinion

State v. Ford

  • 193 So. 3d 1242
  • 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1002
  • 2016 WL 3057519
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
May 18, 2016
Status
Published
Author
Brown
On the bench
Bleich, Brown, Drew, Garrett, Hoc, Moore
Cited by
12 cases

explaining “the entirety of the evidence, whether admitted at the underlying trial or excluded, is properly considered in the determination of factual innocence…”

How later courts described this case

  • explaining “the entirety of the evidence, whether admitted at the underlying trial or excluded, is properly considered in the determination of factual innocence…”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BROWN, C.J.,

concurring in the Opinion on Rehearing Grant.

hi agree with the majority opinion and with Judge Drew’s concurring view. The evidence as presented supports Ford’s *1257 guilt of second degree murder and that his connection was certainly not “tangential.”

DREW, J., concurs with reasons on rehearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.