Opinion

Williams v. Eysink

  • 163 So. 3d 30
  • 2015 La. App. LEXIS 406
  • 2015 WL 921014
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Mar 4, 2015
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown, Drew, Moore, Pitman, Stewart
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ON REHEARING

Before BROWN, STEWART, DREW, MOORE and PITMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

|Our original opinion in this matter assessed court costs in the amount of $2,096.64, to be split equally between the Louisiana Workforce Commission and the City of Ruston, pursuant to La. R.S. 13:5112(A). However, La. R.S. 5112(D) states:

D. This law shall not apply to, nor shall the administrator of Louisiana Employment Security Law be cast for any court costs in, any judicial review proceeding under the provisions of R.S. 23:1634.

Therefore, we revise our original opinion to omit the assessment of court costs to the defendant, Louisiana Workforce Commission. The City of Ruston is still responsible for ½ of the court costs, which amounts to $1,048.32. With these modifications, the application for rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.