Opinion

Guillot v. Guillot

  • 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 364
  • 161 So. 3d 841
  • 2014 La. App. LEXIS 3065
  • 2014 WL 7264510
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Dec 23, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Amy
On the bench
Amy, Conery, Cooks
Cited by
6 cases

explaining that the plaintiffs consent is a defense to intentional battery

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that the plaintiffs consent is a defense to intentional battery

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

AMY, J.,

concurring.

| J join in the majority opinion’s affirmation of the underlying judgment, finding no manifest error in the jury’s factual findings or legal error in the jury charges and/or verdict form.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.