reaffirming the principle that it is necessary for the municipality to identify whether the hiring, training, or supervising person is a police officer in deciding whether a municipality is immune
How later courts described this case
- reaffirming the principle that it is necessary for the municipality to identify whether the hiring, training, or supervising person is a police officer in deciding whether a municipality is immune
- “As noted previously, a plaintiff can show that a State agent acted beyond his or her authority by proffering evidence that the State agent failed to discharge duties pursuant to detailed rules or regulations, such as those stated on a checklist.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
MOORE, Chief Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur with denying the writ of mandamus on the negligent-training-and-supervision claim. I dissent, however, from issuing the writ of mandamus on the remaining claims.