Opinion

City of Gadsden v. Boman

  • 143 So. 3d 695
  • 2013 WL 5966767
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Nov 8, 2013
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Bolin, Bryan, Himself, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
Cited by
12 cases

“A permanent injunction is ‘[a]n injunction granted after a final hearing on the merits,’ Black’s Law Dictionary 855 (9th ed. 2009

How later courts described this case

  • “A permanent injunction is ‘[a]n injunction granted after a final hearing on the merits,’ Black’s Law Dictionary 855 (9th ed. 2009
  • outlining general principles of contract interpretation

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MURDOCK, Justice

(concurring as to case no. 1120633 and dissenting as to case no. 1120579).

I concur in the reversal of the judgment of the trial court awarding injunctive relief against the Board members in case no. 1120633. As to case no. 1120579, in which this Court reverses the trial court’s judgment awarding injunctive relief in favor of Boman and against the City of Gadsden, I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I believe that the trial court intended by its February 5, 2013, and February 7, 2013, orders to enter a final judgment providing permanent injunctive relief against the City of Gadsden. Furthermore, I see no basis in Gadsden’s brief to this Court for reversing the judgment against it; therefore, I would affirm that judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.