recognizing that language is ambiguous where it “is susceptible to at least two reasonable interpretations”
How later courts described this case
- recognizing that language is ambiguous where it “is susceptible to at least two reasonable interpretations”
- holding “a ‘meeting1 occurs when a majority of the members of a governmental body come together at the same time ” (emphasis added)
- holding “a ‘meeting’ occurs when a majority of the members of a governmental body come together at the same time” (emphasis added)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BOLIN, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in denying Clay C. Slagle’s motion to “disqualify” Special Justice Bernard Harwood. I continue to agree with Justice Shaw’s well reasoned special writing issued on original submission; therefore, I dissent from the overruling of the application for rehearing.