expressly refusing to hold that 'the adequacy of the presentence report should be evaluated in isolation'
How later courts described this case
- expressly refusing to hold that 'the adequacy of the presentence report should be evaluated in isolation'
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
BOLIN, Justice
(dissenting in part and concurring in the result).
I concur only in the result as to Part II of the opinion, and I dissent as to Part III, because it addresses an issue that would not necessarily, or likely, recur after a new presentence report is prepared following this remand.