Opinion

Battle v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 1167
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
May 21, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Teammell, Geaupnee, Green, Gbeetst
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.9%

The opinion

Appeal of LALU V. BATTLE.

Battle v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1853.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

1 B.T.A. 1167 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624 ;

May 21, 1925 , decided Submitted April 16, 1925 .

*2624 W. H. Trigg, Esq., for the Commissioner.

GREEN

Before GRAUPNER, TRAMMELL, and GREEN.

This is an appeal from a deficiency in estate taxes imposed by Title IV of the Revenue Act of 1921 upon the transfer of the net estate of O. M. Battle, deceased. The Commissioner in his answer alleged that the deficiency in the sum of $732.09 theretofore determined by him should be increased in the sum of $160.80, by reason of the fact that the taxpayer took as a deduction from the statutory gross estate attorneys' fees in the sum of $8,040, claimed to have been incurred and paid as an expense attendant upon the administration of said estate, when in truth said sum was incurred and paid by the taxpayer individually for legal services rendered her in the collection of certain insurance policies on the life of the decedent. The taxpayer offered no evidence, and from the admissions in the pleadings and the documentary evidence offered on behalf of the Commissioner the Board makes the following

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer, Lalu V. Battle, of Marshall, Tex., is the surviving widow of O. M. Battle, deceased, late of Marshall, Tex.

DECISION.

The determination of the *2625 Commissioner is approved.

OPINION.

GREEN: The taxpayer has offered no evidence in support of her contentions. We find nothing in the evidence to support the Commissioner's contention that the attorneys' fees allowed and paid were for services rendered the taxpayer herein as an individual. The Commissioner also contends that the attorneys' fees so allowed and paid were excessive, but he has offered no proof to substantiate this contention.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.