Opinion

CHATHAM R.R. CO. v. COMMISSIONER

  • 9 B.T.A. 94
  • 1927 BTA LEXIS 2671
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Nov 14, 1927
Status
Published
On the bench
Love, Littleton, Smith, Trussell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.8%

The opinion

CHATHAM RAILROAD CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

CHATHAM R.R. CO. v. COMMISSIONER

Docket No. 9493.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

9 B.T.A. 94 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2671 ;

November 14, 1927 , Promulgated

*2671 INCOME. - Prior to the taxable years petitioner leased its railroad and property for a term of years, the lessee agreeing to pay all Federal income taxes imposed upon the lessor with reference to the rental. The lessee paid the Federal tax upon the net income returned by petitioner for each year subsequent to the lease. Held, the amount of tax so paid constitutes additional income to the petitioner for the year in which such tax became due and was paid.

James S. Y. Ivins, Esq., for the petitioner.

M. N. Fisher, Esq., for the respondent.

TRUSSELL

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in income taxes in the amounts of $14.61 for the calendar year 1921, $22.52 for the calendar year 1922, and $22.35 for the calendar year 1923. The issue involved is whether the payment, under the terms of a lease, of the lessor's income tax by the lessee constitutes additional income to the lessor.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The Chatham Railroad Co. was during the taxable years here involved, a Massachusetts corporation with its principal office at Chatham. It was the owner of a railroad which it leased to the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railway Co. under a *2672 long term lease which provided, inter alia, that the lessee would pay the Federal income tax of the lessor. The income tax of petitioner for each year was payable and was paid by its lessee in the following year.

For the years 1921, 1922, and 1923 the tentative Federal income tax, as computed by the Commissioner, was $146.13, $180.17, and $178.75 for the respective years. The additional taxes proposed are predicated upon treating as additional income to the petitioner for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923, respectively, the amounts of the tentative income taxes.

OPINION.

TRUSSELL: The issue presented has been decided by the Board in the , and . Following those decisions, petitioner's taxes for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923 should be recomputed by including in income for each year the amount of the tax due and paid in that year by the lessee on petitioner's income of the next preceding year.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, pursuant to Rule 50.

Considered by LITTLETON, SMITH, and LOVE.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.