Opinion

Best Steel Castings Co. v. Commissioner

  • 6 B.T.A. 274
  • 1927 BTA LEXIS 3569
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Feb 19, 1927
Status
Published
On the bench
Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.8%

The opinion

BEST STEEL CASTINGS CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Best Steel Castings Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 8326.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

6 B.T.A. 274 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3569 ;

February 19, 1927 , Promulgated

*3569 W. W. Spalding, Esq., for the petitioner.

Geo. G. Witter, Esq., for the respondent.

SMITH

*274 This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income and profits taxes for the year 1919 in the amount of $15,311.53. The petitioner alleges error on the part of the Commissioner (1) in computing invested capital for the taxable year 1919 by reason of the fact that he reduced the current earnings available for the payment of dividends by $48,397.07, representing the tentative tax liability for 1919, as computed by the Commissioner, and that, as a result of this computation, the invested capital has been reduced by $28,263.24 on account of the dividend paid on April 21, 1919, in excess of the alleged current earnings to that date, and (2) by reason of the fact that the Commissioner in computing the petitioner's invested capital erroneously deducted from invested capital at the beginning of the taxable year $117,495.77 on account of income and profits taxes of the preceding year, thereby erroneously reducing its profits-tax credit and erroneously increasing its tax liability for such taxable year in the approximate amount of $7,500.

FINDINGS *3570 OF FACT.

The petitioner is a California corporation with its principal office in San Francisco.

The available earnings of the petitioner for the year 1919 as computed by the Commissioner were $153,068.38. Out of these earnings a dividend of $72,000 was paid on April 21, 1919. In computing what portion of the net earnings of $153,068.38 was available for the payment of the dividend of $72,000 on April 21, 1919, the Commissioner deducted from the net earnings of $153,068.38 the amount of $48,397.09, which the Commissioner alleged was the tentative tax liability for the year 1919, and used the balance, or $104,671.29, as the amount of earnings available for the payment of dividends. The excess of the dividend over the amount of available earnings up to April 21, 1919, as computed by the Commissioner, was then prorated and the prorated amount of $28,263.24 was deducted from invested capital.

In computing the petitioner's invested capital for the year 1919 the Commissioner deducted from invested capital at the beginning of the taxable year $117,795.77 on account of income and profits taxes *275 of a preceding year prorated from the dates the payments became due, thus *3571 reducing its profits-tax credit and increasing its tax liability for the taxable year in the approximate amount of $7,500.

OPINION.

SMITH: It must be held that the Commissioner was in error in reducing the amount of earnings available for the payment of the dividend on April 21, 1919, by the amount of a tentative tax payable for the year 1919. .

The second point raised by the petitioner based upon the decision of the Board in the , is now ruled adversely to the petitioner by section 1207 of the Revenue Act of 1926. See .

Judgment will be entered on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.