Opinion

Bates v. Commissioner

  • 4 B.T.A. 1079
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2071
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Sep 27, 1926
Status
Published
On the bench
Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.7%

The opinion

ELIZABETH W. BATES, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Bates v. Commissioner

Docket No. 10179.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

4 B.T.A. 1079 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2071 ;

September 27, 1926 , Decided

*2071 Coupons payable January 1, 1923, and deposited in a bank for collection on December 23, 1922, constitute income of the owner for the year 1923 and not for the year 1922.

Elizabeth W. Bates pro se.

Henry Ravenel, Esq., for the respondent.

SMITH

*1079 This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income tax for the year 1923 in the amount of $133.76. The question presented to whether the petitioner is liable to income tax for the year 1923 upon income returned by her for the year 1922.

*1080 FINDINGS OF FACT.

The petitioner is a resident of Atlanta, Ga. She filed an incometax return for the year 1922 and included therein $1,115 of coupons on bonds payable on January 1, 1923. The coupons were deposited in the petitioner's bank on December 23, 1922. The petitioner did not include this $1,115 in her income-tax return for the year 1923, since she had included it for the preceding year. The Commissioner added to the income reported for the year 1923 the $1,115 in question.

OPINION.

SMITH: It is the contention of the petitioner that she received income of $1,115 when she deposited coupons of that face value *2072 in her bank on December 23, 1922; that the amount was made available to her at that time and constituted taxable income for 1922. The Commissioner, on the other hand, contends that the debtor corporations did not pay to interest until on or after January 1, 1923, and that if the petitioner was given credit for the coupons by her bank the bank simply advanced the amount of them as a loan.

There is no evidence before this Board that the petitioner sold her coupons to the bank. So far as appears from the record, title to the coupons was in the petitioner until they were redeemed by the debtor corporation. We must therefore hold from the evidence that the income from the coupons was received by the petitioner in 1923.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.