Opinion

Goodman v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 915
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2756
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Mar 30, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Lansdon, Graupner, Smith, Littleton
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.5%

The opinion

Appeal of THERESA GOODMAN.

Goodman v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1421.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

1 B.T.A. 915 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2756 ;

March 30, 1925 , decided Submitted March 18, 1925 .

*2756 The determination of the Commissioner is approved because of insufficiency of evidence to support the taxpayer's contentions.

Joseph J. Goodman, for the taxpayer.

Arthur J. Seaton, Esq., for the Commissioner.

Before GRAUPNER, LANSDON, LITTLETON, and SMITH.

A hearing was had on this appeal March 18, 1925. From the oral and documentary evidence presented, the Board makes the following

FINDINGS OF FACT.

1. The taxpayer is an individual engaged in the general merchandise business at Princess Anne, Md.

2. A deficiency letter was mailed to the taxpayer on November 14, 1924, showing a deficiency in income tax in the amount of $239.77 for the calendar years 1920, 1921, and 1923.

3. The Commissioner determined by an investigation that the deductions from gross income claimed on account of expenses were in excess of the actual expenses and found the net profit to be 12 per cent of sales. On this basis the tax proposed to be assessed was computed.

DECISION.

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is approved. The taxpayer failed to adduce satisfactory evidence to show that the net profit determined by the Commissioner was incorrect. *2757

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.