Opinion

National Bank of Baltimore v. Commissioner

  • 3 B.T.A. 1038
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2497
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Mar 30, 1926
Status
Published
On the bench
Steenhagen, Love
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.5%

The opinion

APPEAL OF THE NATIONAL BANK OF BALTIMORE.

National Bank of Baltimore v. Commissioner

Docket No. 3844.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

3 B.T.A. 1038 ; 1926 BTA LEXIS 2497 ;

March 30, 1926 , Decided Submitted July 9, 1925 .

*2497 H. C. Poffenberger, Esq., for the taxpayer.

R. P. Smith, Esq., for the Commissioner.

*1038 Before STERNHAGEN and LOVE.

The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $949.61 income and profits tax for 1919 by including in gross income an amount of $6,195 received by the petitioner as the last payment on account of the principal of a loan existing in 1911, and an amount of $11,413.18 received in that year as accumulated interest on the original loan.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

On September 1, 1911, the petitioner had loaned to a partnership the sum of $105,000 on demand negotiable notes secured by negotiable bills of lading and warehouse receipts. Some of the bills of lading and warehouse receipts were forgeries. Some payments were made, or in some other way the account was reduced to a balance outstanding on November 3, 1911, of $71,317.78. On November 3, 1911, a national bank examiner was examining the petitioner's books, and he suggested that the petitioner immediately charge off $70,000 of *1039 the account, which the board of directors thereupon authorized on November 4, 1911. Of this $70,000 charged off, payments amounting to $13,805 were received *2498 up to June 30, 1913. Later one of the partners wanted to borrow $10,000 from the petitioner, which the petitioner would only lend with a satisfactory assurance of repayment of the $70,000. One of the partners wrote the petitioner a letter in which he said he reacknowledged the debt and intended to pay it. He gave notes for the amount, signed by him and his brother, and payments were made of $20,000 in 1917, $30,000 in 1918, and $6,195 in 1919. In 1919 interest on the account was received of $11,413.18.

The deficiency should be computed by excluding $6,195 from petitioner's income for 1919. Judgment accordingly will be settled on 15 days' notice, under Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.