Opinion

McEwen Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 73
  • 1924 BTA LEXIS 254
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Nov 18, 1924
Status
Published
On the bench
Ghaupner, Littleton, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.4%

The opinion

Appeal of McEWEN LUMBER CO.

McEwen Lumber Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 196.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

1 B.T.A. 73 ; 1924 BTA LEXIS 254 ;

November 18, 1924 , decided Submitted November 6, 1924 .

*254 Under sections 215 and 235 of the Revenue Act of 1918 a taxpayer is not entitled to deduct from gross income a portion of the original cost of erection of buildings and installation of machinery during the year.

Mr. W. B. McEwen, president of the corporation, for the taxpayer.

J. A. Adams, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.

*73 Before GRAUPNER, LITTLETON, and SMITH.

From the oral testimony given before it the Board makes the following

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The taxpayer is a North Carolina corporation with its principal office at Azales, North Carolina.

The deficiency letter was mailed to the taxpayer by the Commissioner on July 17, 1924.

The taxes in controversy are income taxes for the calendar year 1919 in the amount of $4,984.82.

During the year 1919 the taxpayer constructed on its property at Portsmouth, Va., a planing mill which consisted of buildings and machines installed therein. The exact cost of the buildings and machinery is not shown. During the calendar year 1919 the taxpayer charged off against buildings the sum of $4,772.95 and against machinery the sum of $5,678.76, or a total *255 of $10,451.71, which represented part of the original cost of the erection of buildings and installation of machinery. The amount of $10,451.71 was deducted by taxpayer from gross income in its return for 1919, in addition to a reasonable amount for depreciation arising from wear and tear, on the ground that the amount represented excessive and arbitrary cost of labor and material in constructing the planing mill plant.

Upon audit of the return for the year 1919 the Commissioner disallowed the deduction of the said amount of $10,451.71.

DECISION.

Under sections 215 and 235 of the Revenue Act of 1918 the taxpayer is not entitled, in computing net income, to deduct any portion of the claimed excessive amount paid out for buildings and machinery in erection of its planing mill plant.

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is approved.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.