Opinion

Conlen v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 472
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2888
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jan 31, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Lansdon, Grattpner, Smith, Littleton
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Appeal of WILLIAM J. CONLEN

Docket No. 815.

Capital stock of a corporation received by an individual in 1920 as compensation for services

rendered is subject to tax as income on the basis of the fair market value of such stock.

Submitted January 28, 1925; decided January 81, 1925.

William J. Conlen, the taxpayer, in his own behalf.

Willis D. Nance, Esq. (Nelson T. Hartson, Solicitor of Internal Revenue) for the Commissioner.

Before Graupner, Lansdon, Littleton, and Smith.

This appeal is taken from a deficiency in the amount of $3,021.60, determined by the Commissioner

for the calendar year 1920, and presents the question of whether capital stock of a corporation

received by an individual is taxable as income on the basis of the par value of the stock or upon

its fair market value. The Commis sioner computed the tax on the basis of the par value of the

stock. The taxpayer did not appear at the hearing. From the Commis sioner's answer and from

stipulations filed, the Board makes the fol lowing

FINDINGS OF FACT

The taxpayer is an individual residing at Merion, Pa. In 19~0, he received as compensation for

legal services stock in Chas. Cory & Son, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as follows

150 shares of class B preferred stock, par value $100. 00 26 shares of class A preferred stock,

par value 10.00

This stock was not included as income in the taxpayer's income-tax return for 1920.

The 150 shares of class B preferred stock, par value $100, have a fair market value *f $53 per

share, or a total fair market value of $7,950. The 26 shares of class A preferred stock, par

value $10, have a fair market value of $130 per share, or a total fair market value of $3,380.

DECISION

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is approved in part and disapproved in part. The

tax will be recomputed on the basis of the fair market value of the capital stock in accordance

with the above findings and the amount of the deficiency will be finally settled on consent or 10

days' notice in accordance with Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.