Opinion

Hawks v. Nursery Co. v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 1207
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2613
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
May 23, 1925
Status
Published
On the bench
Graupner, Trammell
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Appeal of HAWKS NURSERY CO.

Docket No. 1469.

Submitted May 6, 1925; decided May 23, 1925.

Charles H. Hawks, Jr., for the taxpayer.

W. Frank Gibbs, Esq., for the Commissioner.

Before Graupner and Tkammell.

This is an appeal from a deficiency in the amount of $566.67, in come and profits taxes for the

calendar year 1920. The sole issue before the Board is the March 1, 1913, value of the land

described in the findings.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

1. Taxpayer was a New York corporation doing business during the year 1920 in the City of

Rochester, N e w York.

2. In the year 1902 it purchased two acres of land lying without the limits of the City of

Rochester, for which it paid the sum of $2,000. This land was acquired for business purposes of

the cor poration and various structures were erected upon it subsequent to the date of purchase.

3. Subsequent to the acquisition of the property by the taxpayer in 1902, and some time prior to

1909, the corporate limits of Roches ter were extended to include the property acquired by the

taxpayer, and the surrounding property was subdivided into blocks and lots for sale as city lots.

4. In 1920 the taxpayer sold the real property in question for the sum of $10,423. In its income-

tax return filed March 15, 1921, the taxpayer reported the March 1, 1913, value of the buildings

to be $2,500 and of the land to be $5,600, or a total of $8,100, and, in the paymentofitstaxes,

paiduponaprofitof$2,323. Inauditingthe return the Commissioner allowed the valuation of $2,500 on

the buildings, but disallowed the March 1, 1913, value of $5,600 placed upon the land, on the

ground that the evidence as to value which was submitted by the taxpayer was insufficient. The

Commissioner took the cost of $2,000 in the year 1902 as the proper value for the land and

asserted that a profit of $5,923 had been realized. The deficiency results from the difference

between the value of the land allowed by the Commissioner and the March 1, 1913, value claimed by

the taxpayer.

5. The fair market value of the land was $5,600 on March 1, 1913.

DECISION.

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is disallowed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.