Opinion

Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. Commissioner

  • 9 B.T.A. 1087
  • 1928 BTA LEXIS 4302
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jan 7, 1928
Status
Published
Author
Steknhagen
On the bench
Teammell, Phillips, Morkis, Steknhagen, Murdock, Milliken
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

Steknhagen,

dissenting: In my opinion, the decision should be for the respondent on the first point. I can not see how the purchase by a corporation of its own stock and its subsequent transfer can be an expense either paid or incurred. The only outlay by the corporation was the purchase price of some outstanding stock. This was not an expense. The resale or reissuance of the stock for less than the purchase price involved no loss, Simmons & Hammond Mfg. Co., 1 B. T. A. 803, and since it carried with it no further outlay or liability, it seems to me there was no expense to deduct. The employees bought at a cheap price, but so far as the corporation was concerned there was simply a change in the personnel of its stockholders. The corporation avoided an expense by giving the employee at an advantageous price an opportunity of sharing in future earnings or liquidation.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.