Opinion

Pennell v. Commissioner

  • 4 B.T.A. 1039
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2100
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Sep 25, 1926
Status
Published
Author
Sternhagen
On the bench
Sternhagen
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

OPINION.

SteRNhagen :

The payment by an individual for general personal legal services, including the preparation of a will, are obviously not “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business,” as provided in section 214(a) (1) of the Revenue Act of 1918. If any part thereof could be so classified the burden of allocation must be on the petitioner and not on the Board. We need not therefore discuss the question whether, since the payment of the entire bill of $20,000 was equally *1040 divided as between 1920 and 1921 without any earmarking, the petitioner could properly allocate the $3,000 entirely to the first payment in 1920.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.