Opinion

Paine v. Commissioner

  • 37 B.T.A. 427
  • 1938 BTA LEXIS 1040
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Feb 25, 1938
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Foss, Murdock, Disney
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Murdock,

concurring: I think that Paine entered into the transaction for profit. The profit which he expected was to come from enhanced reputation in his business as a naval architect rather than from dividends or increased value of the stock. However, the record does not show that loss resulted from the expenditure, viewed as that kind of a transaction.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.