Opinion

Hudson v. Commissioner

  • 14 B.T.A. 983
  • 1929 BTA LEXIS 3009
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Jan 3, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Gmoen
On the bench
Gmoen
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.2%

The opinion

*984 OPINION.

GmoEN:

The petitioner did not appear and was not represented at the hearing. The above facts have been found from allegations of the petition which were admitted in the answer and from a stipulation of facts entered into by the parties.

*985 The petitioner is contending that in computing the profit or loss resulting from the sale of a portion of his and his wife’s royalty interests, they should be permitted to apply against the selling price such amounts as the respondent would have allowed them as deductions under section 214 (a) (10) of the 1921 Act for depletion based on a discovery value as if they had not sold such a portion of their royalty interest. This was the identical question that was before the Board in the Appeal of Anna Taylor, 3 B. T. A. 1201, in which we decided adversely to such a contention. Our decision there is controlling here. See also Appeal of S. T. Hunt, 4 B. T. A. 1077.

Judgment will be entered for the respondent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.