Opinion

Potter v. Commissioner

  • 10 B.T.A. 563
  • 1928 BTA LEXIS 4070
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Feb 7, 1928
Status
Published
Author
Littleton
On the bench
Phillips, Littleton, Love, Geeen, Arundell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.0%

The opinion

*565 OPINION.

Littleton:

The facts in this proceeding bring it within the decision of the Board in Robert W. Bingham, 8 B. T. A. 603. The evidence in the record shows that the petitioner did not receive the dividends declared on December 31, 1922, or notice thereof, until 1923, and that he did not receive the dividends declared on December 31, 1923, or notice thereof, until 1924. On the authority of the decision of the Board in Robert W. Bingham, supra, it is the opinion of the Board that the income reported by the petitioner for 1923,.. arising from the dividends of the banks mentioned, was correct and that the Commissioner erred in excluding the dividends declared in December, 1922, and received in 1923, and including the dividends declared in 1923 and received in 1924.

Reviewed by the Board.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Phillips, Geeen, Love, and Arundell dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.