Opinion

Wood v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 957
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2731
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 7, 1925
Status
Published
Author
James
On the bench
James, Teussell, Tbammell, Stebnhagen
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*958 OPINION.

James:

In the foregoing appeal no material fact alleged by the taxpayer in the petition was admitted by the Commissioner. The taxpayer was granted three separate opportunities- to appear and present evidence in support of the petition. On each of these three occasions, the taxpayer failed to avail himself of the opportunity so extended. In justice to taxpayers prepared to prosecute their appeals, the Board may not permit its calendar to be encumbered by taxpayers who by themselves or through their counsel adopt dilatory tactics to delay the hearing of their appeals.

There being no evidence on which the Board can act in this appeal, the determination of the Board must be that the deficiency heretofore determined by the Commissioner is approved.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.