Opinion

Sutton v. Commissioner

  • 1 B.T.A. 101
  • 1924 BTA LEXIS 244
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Nov 28, 1924
Status
Published
Author
James
On the bench
James, Sternhagbn, Teussell, Teammell
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

OPINION.

James:

The taxpayer is premature in the filing of his petition. It appears that he has been notified merely of one of the steps which precede the determination of the Commissioner that a deficiency in tax exists. On the face of the petition it appears that no deficiency in tax has since the enactment of the Revenue Act of 1924 been determined by the Commissioner. Therefore, the taxpayer has not stated one of the facts essential to an appeal. Such a deficiency may never be determined. When a deficiency is determined, the taxpayer will receive the statutory 60-day notice of such determination, and upon that notice he may at that time petition this Board to hear and determine his tax liability.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.