Opinion

Union Inv. Co. v. Commissioner

  • 21 T.C. 659
  • 1954 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 306
Court
United States Tax Court
Filed
Jan 29, 1954
Status
Published
Author
Withey
On the bench
Opper,Withey,Raum
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.2%

payment of officer's legal fees required under contract

How later courts described this case

  • payment of officer's legal fees required under contract

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Withey, J., dissenting: Deductions from gross income are not a matter of right but are a matter of legislative grace and a taxpayer claiming a deduction must bring himself squarely within the terms of a statute granting it. New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U. S. 435 , affirming 24 B. T. A. 886. Deductions for expenditures incurred for lobbying activities and for the promotion or defeat of legislation are outside the statutory grant relied on by the petitioner. Textile Mills Securities Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U. S. 326 . Where, as here, the taxpayer acting through its vice president makes an expenditure not shown to have been for other than lobbying activities or for the promotion or defeat of legislation and as a result incurs an additional expenditure for the defense of the vice president, the latter expenditure is so directly related to the former as to partake of its character. In the absence of a showing as to what the character of the former expenditure was, I would sustain the respondent in disallowing the latter.

Raum, J., agrees with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.