Opinion

Pacific Affiliate, Inc. v. Commissioner

  • 18 T.C. 1175
  • 1952 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 79
Court
United States Tax Court
Filed
Sep 30, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Muedock
On the bench
Raum
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.2%

The opinion

Muedock, J., dissenting: I do not agree that the money borrowed to purchase the Federal Land Bank bonds represented borrowed capital. The taxpayer purchased those bonds knowing that it would sustain an income loss because it borrowed money to buy the bonds at an interest rate higher than that paid by the bonds. The only advantage which it expected was a tax advantage in that it thought, mistakenly, that the interest on the bonds would be tax exempt and it would be allowed a deduction for the interest on the money borrowed. This point should be decided against the petitioner on the authority of Hart-Bartlett-Sturtevant Grain Co., 12 T. C. 760 , affd. 182 F. 2d 153 , which can not be distinguished satisfactorily.

TurNer, Harron, and Raum, JJ., agree with this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.