Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stiner v. Yelle

  • 174 Wash. 402
  • 25 P.2d 91
  • 1933 Wash. LEXIS 857
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Sep 8, 1933
Status
Published
Author
Main
On the bench
Tolman, Steinert, Main
Cited by
59 cases

business and occupation tax measured as tax on gross income of business upheld as excise

How later courts described this case

  • business and occupation tax measured as tax on gross income of business upheld as excise

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Main, J.

(dissenting)- — In my opinion, the tax in question is an excise and not a property tax within the contemplation of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution of this state.

Judge Steinert’s dissenting opinion may be said to be divided into two parts. With the first, I do not

*425

agree. "With the second, I am in accord. I concur in that part of the opinion beginning with the sentence, “I now approach the matter from another angle,” and continuing to the end thereof. For the reasons stated in that part of the opinion, I dissent.

Millard, J., concurs with Main, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.