Opinion

Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire Insurance

  • 189 Wash. 590
  • 66 P.2d 827
  • 109 A.L.R. 1472
  • 1937 Wash. LEXIS 532
Court
Washington Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 29, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Tolman
On the bench
Millard, Tolman
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.3%

The opinion

Tolman, J.

(dissenting) — In my judgment, this case cannot be distinguished from the case of

Markham Shingle Co. v. Royal Ins. Co.,

106 Wash. 309 , 179 Pac. 799 ; and since I am unwilling to overrule that case, I am disposed to affirm the judgment in this case.

Main, J., concurs with Tolman, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.