Opinion

Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls

  • 74 S.W.2d 661
  • 1933 Tex. App. LEXIS 1407
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 10, 1933
Status
Published
On the bench
Conner, Dunkdin, Dunklin, Lattimore, Power
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

On Rehearing.

This cause is before the court on motion for rehearing. I have carefully reviewed the evidence. It is my judgment that competent evidence evincing fraud and collusion was not proven sufficient to form a basis for a jury issue. The evidence must be of sufficient force to register more than a suspicion or surmise.

It is my opinion further that, under the facts, appellants' cross-action was barred by limitation.

Without further restating the case or the law applicable thereto, I approve the reasoning and conclusion of Judge DUNKLIN in his original opinion, and concur in the conclusion reached by him that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.